Yes, from the ingredients they put in there. You don’t put oil in your lungs. Again, not new science.

That’s not cigarette replacement which is where the 95% reduction in harm comes from.

I only vape cannabis. I used vapes to quit smoking. I mixed my own juice and tapered off the nicotine until I found inhaling custard flavoured disco smoke unappealing.

Those food flavourings have been cooked in ovens, which are significantly hotter than vapes, in both commercial and home use for decades. The ones that caused problems got removed. They are safe to inhale, even in commercial high use areas. This is not some new area of science.

We’ve also been pumping disco ‘smoke’ into rooms with people in for decades, any risks would have been identified. It is safe, unless you vape a stupid amount. It’s like 95x safer, but if you then vape 95x more than you smoke, then Darwinism is fine.

Inhaling smoke is a far higher cancer risk.

Quality over quantity.

The chemicals are used in food. We would know they are harmful, the same way we discovered popcorn lung…

The risk is reduced by 95%. What don’t you understand?

Popcorn lung was discovered in popcorn factories, so those types of flavours are not used in vapes anymore.

These food flavourings have also been tested by billions of people when baking.

Of course, if you inhale nothing but flavoured vape juice, like the rat in the trial, then obviously it’s going to cause harm.

Vaping is not worse than smoking on any level. It’s about 95% better.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e-cigarettes-around-95-less-harmful-than-tobacco-estimates-landmark-review

None of that says it’s worse than smoking. Smoking gives you cancer.

Source?