• razen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    How will they be able tackle the play integrity checks and all those things?

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I remember my original Moto G. It was a good phone for the time. I will follow Graphene wherever they go until a Linux phone is ready.

  • HaustierElch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Very interesting, I’ll keep an eye on Motorola phones. Not that I need a new one anytime soon, but still that’s the kind of thing that could be refreshing to read news about.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s the point, right? Google is trying to lock down Android even more, and third party vendors can see the increasing risk. If they fork now, they can maybe undercut the increasing monopoly efforts.

      • Newsteinleo@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I am sure they are also seeing a growing demand for more privacy, the only reason own a pixel is because of GrapheneOS. If I could buy a phone with the OS pre installed I would, don’t know if they are going to do that. Also, by patterning with GrapheneOS they don’t has the development cost and they can trade on Graphenes name

  • qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What’s the likelihood that Motorola will eventually lock down GrapheneOS though? Imho it’d be a bad move if they did. The FOSS mobile OS community has matured to the point that we don’t need to rely on for-profit monoliths any more. Motorola would be smart to lead the way to where the mobile device economy will be.

    • darkmogool@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      matured to the point that we don’t need to rely on for-profit monoliths any more

      Which phones are we using for Graphene OS at the moment? Ah, yeah… Google… well known for its non-profit behaviour… I say: Give me alternatives which we aren’t to try to get rid of in the first place.

    • j2k4@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Jesus dude let them get compatibility before you bring out the assumptions.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I always thought Pixel was the platform to have for fucking around with the OS and stuff. Of fucking course I was an idiot.

    • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Don’t be too hard on yourself, they definitely put money and effort into influencing opinions in all the subversive ways they can manage. But also, let this be a lesson to always check alternatives and their reason for existing. I consider it part of best practices.

        • QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, I’m aware that Microsoft coined that phrase, but Google seems to be doing something quite similar.

          Google embraced the creation of an open-sourced Android project, extended its capabilities with centralized software distribution, and is now extinguishing by forcing developers to comply with its new requirements and banning third-party app stores.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    My biggest concern is the life cycle of the device. I almost went with Motorola for my last phone, but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates. Is that likely to be better on GrapheneOS? If so, that is a huge win imo. If not, it still isn’t ideal because I don’t want to have to buy a new phone every 2 years…

    • Willdrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thats the trick, when a company supports romming, you can extend the support for however long you want!

    • Hugging Stars@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      GrapheneOS was claiming 5-year support IIRC. Apple level support is infeasible. Not sure how affordable longer firmware support from Qualcomm is.

    • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why do you think they are $300-500? I don’t care about “only” 3 years of updates if i don’t have to spend $1300 on a friggin cellphone.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I mean, I sort of get what you are saying but it also feels a little like Grimes’s boots thing from Terry Pratchet. Like, I can spend $200- $300 and get a phone that will stop getting security updates in 2-3 years… Or I can spend $700-$1000 to get a phone that comes with 7-10 years of security updates. Money per year, you are the same or better off if you can afford the up-front cost of the more expensive product, and we are generating a lot less techno-garbage clogging up the planet.

        Generally, I hate the hard limit of use of these things. Coming from desktop computers, if you spend more money the machine is faster, but if you don’t need the speed you can use the cheap machine just as long (or longer if you really don’t need performance). All phones feel like they are just a subscription model.

    • Luffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Reading the original press release might be a good Start

      Their Thinkphones pretty much always had good update policy

      Almost like you cant really sell a 100€ device and expect it to be optimised like a mid range

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates.

      fucking great, less enshittification when they stop shoving the updates down your throat.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yea, except you aren’t getting security updates either… Basically anything connected to the internet should be getting security updates…

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Well, fuck. I really hoped they would pick FairPhone. Motorola is… Okay. I guess they made the Nexus 5 ; which was one of the best phones ever.

    I hope they make a SMALL one, I am so tired of this GIGANTIC pixel 9.

      • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s not the reason, the real reason is Fairphone doesn’t take security seriously. The GrapheneOS devs have called them out numerous times on that.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Motorola gets a little bit of love from me because they were (maybe still are?) the only ones who allowed me to shout “COMRADE MOTO!” to wake my phone up

      I will not say “Hey Google” in a million years. I refuse.

  • ProfThadBach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The reason I got my ZFold5 was I like the fact that it could open up and give me a larger area to view and bigger keyboard. I have gotten the biggest phone I could get for the last 15 years or so because I have a hard time seeing the tiny screens. I would be happy to switch to a new OS but my old ass needs a bigger screen.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Me too. I’ve always bought Google Pixels but I don’t want to give Google my money anymore.

      So I’ll probably buy a Motorola if this deal gets through.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          I’m on a Google Pixel 9A.

          But at least I didn’t pay for it, Google paid me, thanks to a clever mix of a big 9A launch discount, a trade-in discount and the fact that the older Pixel I traded in had already been partially refunded because of the infamous battery problems.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 hours ago

      My last few phones have been Motorolas and I’ve been very very happy with them.

      My only issue was that back then, I wasn’t really paying attention to alternative OSs like Graphene, Lineage or e/os and was therefore not really too concerned with ROM support/chip set. When I switched over to e/os, two of my Motorola’s (including the one I WANT to use with it) has no ROM support because it’s running a Mediatek chipset. So I’m using my second to last one while my nice new one collects dust.

      Moving forward I’ll be paying more attention to Qualcomm vs Mediatek.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        yeah i might focus on Android phones that have Good ROM/ support
        i think their graphene OS powered phone will have bootloader unlocking.

        i hope Google does not take away Sideloading. (but i think graphene returns it)

    • texture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      i bought a mororolla 3 years ago and it still lasts 2 days on a charge. id say go for it.

      • Mwa@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        i gotta see first if Motorola/Lenovo will actually ship graphene OS and other factors.
        they dont sound like bad phones and even better with this collab

  • Luminous5481 [they/them]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is great news. While I still think we should make a push towards Linux phones being mainstream so that we don’t keep this duopoly on OSes, it’s nice to know that at least one manufacturer is currently defying googles obvious goal of suppressing third party ROMs and marketplaces.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Thanks for the reality check. While this a good development, I share your concern and we should not stop,or even slow, developing any fully free as in freedom OS. I tried PostmarketOS on an old Oneplus 6T recently and I estimate we have one or two more phone replacement cycles until I think it’ll be ready for me to switch.

      • punkibas@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have a 6T and was thinking about getting postmarketos on it, what didn’t work for you? Which “desktop” did you choose for it? there’s like 5 options for that and I really have no idea what to do.

        • njordomir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I used KDE because that’s what I use on desktop. I hear some of the others are further along. Flashing was easy. I could not set up my SMB shares in dolphin and if it wont talk to my NAS, it’s not terribly useful to me. I will play around some more with it sooner or later. I believe I used Android- tools on Linux to send the partitions via fastboot commands. It was a 2 gen old phone for me (had the OP9 after it) so I wasn’t worried about anything going wrong. Feel free to shoot me a DM if you get stuck and have a specific question. I will try to help.

    • Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Volla phone (has choice between ubuntu touch and android rom) seems pretty cool.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Motorola Mobility belongs to Chinese Lenovo but headquarters are in Chicago. Not sure if that makes it better or worse regarding privacy and surveillance compared to USA only.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I had completely forgotten Lenovo bought Motorola from Google some 10 years ago. Honestly haven’t seen a Motorola phone in at least that long …

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Been using motorola for a long time. I bought Moto Z in 2016 and it booted with “Motorola company” text in the end of the boot video. After Lenovo acquisition, phone updated and video now said “Motorola, a Lenovo company”.

        Thankfully, Motorola haven’t entshittified over these years. Still a solid phone. Almost no bloat.