cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/53072462

Archived

[…]

The central risk is not a sudden systemic collapse, but a drawn‑out period of sub‑par growth, weak returns on investment, and fragile confidence—a pattern that will sound familiar to students of Japan’s post‑1990 trajectory.

Several specific challenges stand out:

  • Demographics: An aging, shrinking population caps housing demand and undermines the traditional link between urbanization and construction booms.
  • Balance sheets: Developers, local governments, and some financial institutions face long, grinding deleveraging cycles.
  • Policy trade‑offs: Stimulating housing too aggressively risks re‑inflating the bubble; tightening too hard risks tipping growth into a deeper downturn.
  • Confidence: Once households lose faith in property as a one‑way wealth escalator, rebuilding sentiment can take years.

[…]

  • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government. I can fight an eminent domain claim and be compensated properly.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Same is true in China, they have laws lmao.

      I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government.

      Also you kinda can, eminent domain has famously been used against entire populations that a mayor, governor, or urban planner simply didn’t like.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          So what do you not actually care about whether property ownership is meaningfully different in China vs western countries beyond its use as hostile evidence?

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              I told you how things actually work, in both China and America, is anything that doesn’t reinforce preconceived notions bad faith to you?

              • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                You’re using the USA, a country just as shit if not worse than China when it comes to human rights to try and make China look good.

                That’s the bad faith argument.

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago
                  1. Property isn’t a human right.

                  2. America is the easiest as I am most familiar with it since I lived there. There’s no European country I am aware of that doesn’t require you pay money to continue to own property, and have the ability to force you to sell at a price they pick, if they say they have a reason.

                  Yes, you can argue against them in court, that’s true in China too, and there are rare cases where the state doesn’t have a legal mechanism to do so, and the highway or w/e has to be routed around the home, that’s true in China too.