• Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No it is, since not every member participated.

    The whole operation was voluntary. The only reason it gets a NATO sticker is because only NATO members participated.

    If it was an actual NATO operation, it would have been mandatory for all 32 nations. Not just the 13 that actually intervened.

    • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Article 5 does not mandate every nation to participate if any one nation is attached. It is voluntary.

      • iglou@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty states that an armed attack against one NATO member shall be considered an attack against all members, and triggers an obligation for each member to come to its assistance.

        From the nato.int website. It reads to me that if a country refuses to come to the assistance of a country legitimately invoking the article, the country is breaching the treaty.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          the issue is the exact wording is

          will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

          https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/introduction-to-nato/collective-defence-and-article-5

          “such action as it deems necessary”

          assistance can mean many things, and can be very very minimal… eg purposefully ineffective sanctions would satisfy “will assist”