• kip@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    i tried to look up the case but only get loads of results for fritzl

    what age was his daughter? was he popping viagras and crying ‘this is going to hurt me more than it hurts you?’ i would previously have thought that being able to maintain a boner long enough to rape your own daughter (assuming prepubescent) makes you a paedophile. but having just read the ‘primary or exclusive’ bit of the definition i don’t know what to make of it

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It was a younger, and the rapist’s name never got out here. Got quickly buried for whatever reason.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t see why it matters whether the rapist is or isn’t a paedophile.
      He raped a child. That makes him a CSA offender.

      Is there even laws specifically to deal with paedophiles rather than people who rape children?

      • kip@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        yes of course in this or any other specific case it’s not particularly relevant. but it’s something to consider against the general question of what is a paedophile

        re laws, that would be thoughtcrime so i don’t expect there are

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          thoughtcrime

          Yeah, thoughtcrime is pretty much BS and there better be no laws about it.
          I mean, how many times have you had intrusive thoughts about stomping the person you are talking to, without any particular reason and how many times have you actually done that?
          Then there was this guy who actually stomped on my pre-fractured toe and it is pretty easy to distinguish from a thought crime, so I see no grey area here.