• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It absolutely has a point, the point being manufacturing and selling sex toys that look like children is absolutely disgusting.

    And picking your battles doesn’t typically mean arguing against the law being passed on the Internet.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Having sex with a doll also only involves grown adults.

          You justified the ban with it being disgusting so I repeat the question: Why not ban scat fetish then as well?

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Adults doing weird things with other adults is fine with me.

            Adults having sex with something intended to represent a child? Hell no. Selling these things is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Adult men having sex with adult women is fine with me.

              Adult men having sex with another man? Hell no. Engaging in that is the thin end of the wedge in my view.

              Why is this not a valid reason to ban homosexuality but it’s good enough to ban sex dolls?

              • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                I have far better things to do with my time than explain why depicting sex with children is a bad thing to a stranger on the Internet.

                • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  You seem to have plenty of time for moral grandstanding, but the second someone asks you to make a coherent argument, time’s suddenly up.

                  “Disgusting, you’re probably a pedophile, I don’t care that there’s no victim, it’s obvious so I don’t need to explain it” has been your entire contribution so far. If you don’t care about trying to change anyone’s mind, then I don’t know what you’re even doing here besides just making noise.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      ah, the point is that it’s disgusting, thanks for confirming the emptiness of the argument

      next time I’m before an unflushed toilet I’ll call the authorities