Maybe a bit irrelevant but why is the article calling it “China’s battery“? I feel like if the researchers were from any other countries academy of science, say France, the title would have simply been something like “scientists discover new ways for fireproof battery”. Maybe it’d say French scientists or so, but not simply “France’s battery”?

I never thought of using the reciprocal to measure the lower end of the distribution that is really interesting.

He’s talking about the “no one gives a shit because they’re part of the EU” line. If you think that you haven’t been paying attention

Without realizing why it was rejected. I don’t get it, why care so much about 3 lines of code where one np command was replaced by another…