i understand that European states who finance that genocide also took steps to prosecute protests, like what you’re talking about, and how the UK illegally prosecuted people for supporting Palestine action.

if you can’t see it, that’s on you. it’s been obvious since day 1.

And in no way shape or from “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is antisemitic. if anything Implying genocide is a Jewish value is the most dangerous antisemitism being pushed by zionism, which is a settler colonial political movement.

so Iran will get the Gaza treatment. and the world will watch

don’t bother with them, they are a zionist and thinks laws shouldn’t apply to the powerful, (according to other comments they made in this post).

Same as it works to crush the little man.

depends on the country, but the same framework as an individual spreading CSAM.

Musk should be treated like the pedo he is.

Anarchism for the rich(law does not affect them), rugged police state for the poor,

That slogan is not antisemitic, Germany just wants to crack down on protest on a genocide they are collaborating with, that’s the real crime.

Laws need to apply to everyone, otherwise they aren’t laws. I’m just complaining how the state uses their laws, rugged police state for the poor, clemency for the rich.

again, as a Jewish person who used to live in Israel:

from the river to the sea.

my point is: Why when it comes to the public, laws are enforced to the letter, but for corporations, the question of “should the law apply” is a public debate instead of a “Duh. of course”?

i don’t think you get the point

not just banned, but there would be criminal charges brought on the owners.

Musk should be prosecuted for distribution of CSAM.

but lemmy :(

I’m expressing how much their laws are bullshit. they are draconically applied on people protesting a genocide. while the question of “should the law be applied to corporations” is left open as a debatable topic.

Laws are made to protect the ingroup and bind the outgroup.

and even though it was an example of their hypocrisy and not the point of the argument I’ll say it regardless

From the river to the sea Palestine will be free

From the sea to the river Palestine will live forever

so it’s possible but it needs networks to be optimised.

wouldn’t the more users also mean more nodes? making the system scalable? as with more users, the network gets more robust?

would be cool to make a browser and server that work with mesh[core/static]. and given the need for very basic and extremely lightweight websites and services, or even APIs, making a website/api shouldn’t be too complicated.

One can have a weather station and I can have a weather app that makes API calls through mesh[].

decentralized cache would also help, (if you are routing a call for a website, but you recently opened it and have it in your cache, you an send that, decreasing load on the network, and automatically making popular sites more accessible).

Also it could used as a backbone for more robust chat apps/forums/blogs/services.

I wish it was possible, Imagine mixing meshtastic with tcp/ip. it would be as slow as mid 90s, but forums/text based internet that doesn’t rely on anything but communal decentralized infrastructure?

They’ll immediately ban “from the river to the sea” and prosecute everyone who says/displays it. but a multinational corporation is just allowed to break the law and maybe the politicians will at some point allowed them to face the law.

It is so funny that you are all like “that would never work, because there are no such things as vulnerabilities on any system”

Why would I? the whole point is to create a LLM virus, and if the model is good enough, then it is not that hard to create.

Give it access to the terminal and copying itself is trivial.

And your example doesn’t work, because that is the literal original definition of a meme and if you read the original meaning, they are sort of alive and can evolve by dispersal.

They don’t need to outcompete one another. Just outcompete our security.

The issue is once we have a model good enough to do that task, the rest is natural selection and will evolve.

Basically, endless training against us.

The first model might be relatively shite, but it’ll improve quickly. Probably reaching a plateau, and not a Sci fi singularity.

I compared it to cancer because they are practicality the same thing. A cancer cell isn’t intelligent, it just spreads and evolves to avoid being killed, not because it has emotions or desires, but because of natural selection.