Translation?

No, I won’t sit around reading sickening (literally!) news…

Then… don’t? You have no obligation to read what I post.

Criticism cannot be answered by “Make it better yourself”…

What’s wrong with offering a solution to your perceived problem?

Unproven claim. (Ground News and FCMB don’t count, they have scewed perspectives themselves).

I’ve checked a number of them, they all pretty much agree. Where’s the proof that the bias and fact checks are false?

You’d have to take that up with the editor of the site, however it does mention that people with respiratory conditions should limit their time outdoors due to inhaling the dust isn’t very healthy.

Sure, still cool though.

Be the change you want to see in the world. Give alternative sources, share articles, make the community vibrant with activity and informed discussions about the topic at hand.

The usefulness of this community depends on news being shared, with no activity there’s no reason to visit.

And like it or not, politico covers a lot of European politics and its being reported as factual and center left by bias and fact checking sites, so as a source it’s good enough, even if the owner is an ass.

Wait until he learns about the single market.

Somebody should develop an extension that replaces that word with “expresses concern” and we’d all be better for it.

Then you post the articles and a way to read them before I do and all is resolved.

Thanks.

I don’t get what you’re aiming for here. The link can remove a paywall for those who want, if you don’t then don’t use it?

It’s not useless, it does what it says on the tin.

The paywall link is there if you want to use it.

Getting a subscription to the economist is also an option.