Yes, he does. 69.35%, with just 1.06% left to be counted.

https://vtr.valasztas.hu/ogy2026/orszaggyules-osszetetele

I feel I should be reading something into that picture. Is it code for something? /s

Yes that makes a lot of sense. Make it increasingly difficult not to go green, through the tax system, rather than directly paying them to go green.

Great. But there’s still something fundamentally wrong with public money going to support private companies in this way. I fear this sends the message “don’t go green until the government throws you a load of money to incentivise it”. By all means, support the infrastructure (and take the income from it for the public purse), but make the shareholders pay for going green. Or just nationalise if they don’t want to.

Data are plural, as my PhD supervisor always used to say.

It still feels wrong to me when it’s used in the singular, especially in formal communication.