Iran will switch from “reciprocal hits” ​after attacks to continuous ‌strikes on adversaries, and the U.S. will ​not be able ​to control oil prices, the ⁠spokesperson for Tehran’s ​Khatam al-Anbiya military command ​headquarters said on Wednesday.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/iran-says-oil-will-reach-200-barrel-warns-continuous-strikes-2026-03-11/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    the oil price depends ⁠on ​the regional security ​which you have destabilised

    Well, they’re not wrong about that.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Fun Fact: one of the things the DoD does when they’re not fighting worthless crusades for the oil barons is draw up contingency plans for every possible scenario.

    Surprise attacks on allies, alien invasions, etc. These plans have leaked several times over the years, they need to be updated often anyways and everyone does similar planning so it’s never a big deal.

    One of the plans was for fighting the entire world. To do it, they planned on using the navy and missile strikes to shut down global oil transport. America is the largest oil producer after all, only Russia was considered a military threat with enough native supply to resist the effort.

    Anyways, sure is weird how close we’re getting to being able to do that.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Historically, threatening Americans with rising oil prices has never been a good idea.