• JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I wonder if this is some kind of loop hole to get around Reese’s law. I’m not seeing the giant warning labels required on smart brick sets searching online.

    Here’s my Back to the Future sets both pre/post Reese’s Law.

  • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only thing that feels useful in these features is the lighting and I achived that in my LEGO city by picking up some of those wired micro LED strings at Dollar Tree and running them between the floors of the buildings.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s an impressive brick and system to be fair, but not being able to replace the battery is insanity. Also very overpriced.

  • leoj@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    wow, so just more trash and waste for the sake of making toys AI integrated…?

    I’m all for giving kids the tools of the future early (with limits)

    but why do we have to make it disposable? (profit, I know, its rhetorical guys).

    • andyspam@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      You do realize it’s rechargeable, right? I watched jerryrigeverything’s video on it and it’s honestly a pretty neat and impressive little gadget. I cant imagine the battery ever needing to be replaced even if it were designed to be possible. I would expect it to last 5+ years of heavy play before its battery life would be effected enough to notice.

      • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, but my 20+ year old Lego still work today. Can I expect this e-waste to perform the same for my grandchildren as it would today?

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          To be fair, as long as the batteries are easily replaceable and don’t degrade destructively, it might age better than the original Mindstorms components which are a PITA to use today.

          Then again, plain ABS at worst yellows under too much UV.

        • leoj@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          lol five years

          I have legos from 1994.

          Kind of sad how low the bar is for our expectations these days…

          • Geobloke@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’ll still be a lego brick in 10 years, just like a broken down escalator is still a set of stairs

            • leoj@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              except it will contain lithium ion or other dangerous battery tech, albeit in a small amount, but its still a childrens toy.

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Before people get all up in arms about the non-replaceable battery… Do you know how small a LEGO brick is? For them to pack all this functionality in there, they have to be EXTREMELY careful with how they use every millimeter of space, and they have to make sure a kid won’t just… pop open the bottom of the brick and eat the battery or something.

    The article itself even states:

    As you can see in JerryRigEverything’s destructive teardown, it’s difficult to even get at the battery without going through thin, hair-like antennas.

    Break even one of them and the entire brick is nonfunctional.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Turns out there’s not actually much functionality in these at all. An RFID reader and an RGB LED, whoop-de-shit.

      Here’s an example of what cutting-edge brick tech could look like.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Turns out there’s not actually much functionality in these at all. An RFID reader and an RGB LED, whoop-de-shit.

        Where did you get that idea? They have an RFID reader and LED, yes, but they also have a speaker, microphone, accelerometer, light and color sensor, near-field magnetic position detection, and then have to fit the battery alongside all of that, all in a 2x4 brick.

        Here’s an example of what cutting-edge brick tech could look like.

        That brick has a fixed option for what it displays without needing to be entirely reflashed, requires a 4x8 powered baseplate to operate, and compared to the smart brick, doesn’t have RFID, LEDs, sound, color, or light sensing capabilities, no accelerometer, and no ability to detect other bricks near it, along with having no internal battery.

        The smart brick can play different (fully interchangeable without firmware reflashing) sounds based on nearby minifigures and interactable buttons and levers, can display lights and sounds based on rotation and movement, can change how it interacts based on nearby smart bricks, and can also be charged wirelessly and operate standalone. And of course, it’ll be able to respond to sounds later on too.

        The brick from hackaday has a display. That’s it. It’s cool, yes, but it’s nowhere close to the smart brick.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          OK, looks like they actually integrated the speaker, which wasn’t clear at the initial reveal. That’s an improvement. The rest of the sensors fit in basically zero space, so that’s not so impressive, especially since a 2x4 brick has about triple the internal volume as a 2x2 slope brick.

          Doesn’t have … LEDs … color

          It’s a 72x40 OLED display, so that’s actually 2,880 LEDs, on the order of 1,000× as many LEDs as a single RGB LED.

          It can also play Doom.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Isn’t the “Lego” part kinda just the battery casing with bumps on it, though? Batteries often have circuitry. They have the contacts for connecting it to whatever it is powering… they have a case. Sometimes a plastic one…

    Just for conversation sake. I don’t think disposable legos are cool or anything.

    • andyspam@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Check out jerryrigeverything’s video on it. It’s pretty neat. It’s basically just a microcontroller with a battery, nfc coils, charging coils, and sensors. So you place it near other parts of the set and it makes interactive sound effects and lights up and stuff. It recharges with a wireless charging pad and honestly will probably last 10 years+ before the battery degrades meaningfully.