themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down116
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have itwww.xda-developers.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·14 hours agoNTFS? It’s a standard for a reason. Most of the “better” options out there aren’t ready for mainstream/average user use.
minus-squaredaggermoon@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-214 hours agoI need the better options. I need to be able to detect corruption. ZFS and btrfs let me do that. It’s part of the reason why I couldn’t use Windows even if I wanted to.
NTFS? It’s a standard for a reason. Most of the “better” options out there aren’t ready for mainstream/average user use.
I need the better options. I need to be able to detect corruption. ZFS and btrfs let me do that. It’s part of the reason why I couldn’t use Windows even if I wanted to.