• Cloudstash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s the result of women choosing it over and over again…If women got to their senses and actually started NOT buying that junk, what do you think all the big mega corps producing tons and tons of clothes will do? Continue producing same shit clothes or adapting the factories to new, more reasonable clothes?

      • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or again, atop buying clothes cause its the fashion… Easy as that. Stop trying to dress lile pornstars and guess what, suddenly women will have functional clothes like mean, instead of the stupid clothing that mainly hog the market today.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’re wrong about why women’s clothes don’t have pockets. Women were never given a choice to buy clothing with pockets.

      Initially, pockets were not accessible in women’s clothing due to the layers they were required to wear. After the suffragette movement when liberated women began to wear pants, designers intentionally kept pockets small to prop up the purse industry.

      Handbags are one of the most profitable items in the fashion industry.

      • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but again, which year do we exist in now? Not 1850, 1920, 1600, 1500, ill give you that much. Yikes, even the amount of freedom male commoners have today was far from a way of living in the old non-existant times. With the same historically prisioner mindset, you and me would probably not even be allowed on the net, thats reserved for the noble.