AI models generate meal plans that get necessary calories and macronutrients wrong, posing potential health risks to teenagers trying to lose weight

Can AI tools make meal plans that help us lose weight the right way? In a new study, a team of researchers compared AI’s meal planning abilities to those of a dietician. The results showed that AI-made meal plans – when compared to dietician plans – severely undercalculated the needed amount of calories and macronutrients like carbs and overemphasized other macronutrients like proteins and lipids. The team cautioned that teens should not solely rely on AI to make meal plans for weight loss, saying that the consistent deviation of five different AI models from nutritional guidelines recommended by health organizations could have negative effects on growing bodies.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    1·
    10 hours ago

    If that 60% of people who aren’t weren’t occupied with working hard not to starve they might take offense to your use of “we” (Satire)

    • Iconoclast@feddit.ukEnglish
      2·
      3 hours ago

      Food isn’t expensive - high quality food is. Junk is cheap which is why obesity is especially issue with low-income families. Nobody is starving.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        1·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t know where you live, but where I live junk is stupid fucking expensive compared to veggies, and an increasing number of people are still overweight. A single 300-350g frozen pizza will set you back at least 6EUR, I can easily buy fresh veggies for a meal to feed a family of 4 people for 12EUR, less if you try to save money. I simply don’t buy in to the whole cost premise being the reason.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.ukEnglish
          1·
          2 hours ago

          3 euros worth of vegetables almost definitely doesn’t have the same calorie content than 3 euros worth of any junk food. This is true independent of where you live in the western world.

            • Iconoclast@feddit.ukEnglish
              1·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah because poor people are famously known for switching to home cooked vegan meals which naturally decreases their calorie intake.

                • Iconoclast@feddit.ukEnglish
                  1·
                  1 hour ago

                  Cost isn’t the only issue but it plays a big factor and this is a well established fact I didn’t think I’d even need to debate.

                  High calorie and low nutrition food (processed snacks, sugary drinks, fast food, refined carbs, and added fats/sugars) are cheaper per calorie than their nutrient-dense higher quality counterparts (fresh vegetables, fruits, lean proteins, whole grains, etc.).

                  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
                    1·
                    1 hour ago

                    It is not “well established”, your own link only lists it as one possibility out of several, and is by no means conclusive.

                    also from your source:

                    Limited time and resources: Another theory suggests that people with low food security have limited time, knowledge, and resources to engage in healthy eating and exercise.

                    This is a highly complex issue, and cost doesn’t seem to be the main driver at all, definitely not conclusively.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        1·
        2 hours ago

        I am not talking about people who have easy acces to processed foods.

        I don’t have exact stats nor know how big% of the world that is but people going to bed hungry and being underweight is absolutely still happening.