Limited to early testers for now, but coming to the public soon.

  • Redjard@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The monitor sends you a list of accepted input formats. You can sanity check among the list for any outliers, without online information and without hardcoding limits.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      How do you propose you sanity check numbers beyond checking whether or not they’re within a sane range, i.e. a hardcoded limit? It’s not like you can trust a monitor that’s potentially feeding you bad values to limit the number of bad values it gives you.

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I can though.If all the profiles are garbage it’s beyond saving anyway, a single outlier can be ignored.

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If all the profiles are garbage, then:

          • it would be bad UX to start using one of the garbage profiles and declare that the monitor’s now working.
          • it would be better UX to notice all the profiles have nonsensical values, fall back to a basic one all monitors typically support, and display an error message.