Politico is owned by the german Axel Springer SE, a publisher that also owns Bild, Fakt (polish) and Welt among others.
The publisher and its news outlets (with the aforementioned Bild, Fakt and Welt most prominent) is a main driver for a news coverage and reporting that is jointly responsible for the rise of the far right in Germany and Europe.
Politico itself has published so-called Native Ads, a form of advertisng that is designed like op-ed articles and other opinion pieces in a way that is hard to differeentiate from regular, non-sponsored content, mostly for fossile fuel companies but also healt insurance, finance and weapons industries. (Source 1, Source 2).
That sums up to a news outlet that should not be shared, not be trusted and hence, not be posted here. It was not an issue mostly since this outlet wasn’t posted here often , but recently, Politico articles are getting posted very frequently again, so I suggest the ban now.
Edit: lost a word
Edit 2: it should be noted that there is another publisher with a similar name (Springer Nature with several subsidiaries), but that company os not affiliated with Axel Springer SE and has different issues.
Like, if you see an article marked “sponsored” by UnitedHealthcare and then take everything they say at face value, that’s just because the reader’s dumb.
Do you know what “native advertisement” is?
no
The publisher and its news outlets (with the aforementioned Bild, Fakt and Welt most prominent) is a main driver for a news coverage and reporting that is jointly responsible for the rise of the far right in Germany and Europe.
Is there any proof for that? I keep hearing the claim often but never once is any kind of proof presented.
What do you want to have evidence for? That BILD is Germany’s medium reaching the most people? Here, evidence. That repitition of positions influences people’s opinions? Yep, proven. That BILD distributes right wind populism? Tadaa. Now put the puzzle together, it’s not hard.
yeah BILD is well known for that. but what about Welt?
Same, but nicer words. Also well known for that.
It’s not like there’s an abundance of EU focused titles. They often have good and pertinent articles, just judge by article.
Outright banning one of the most influential sites in the EU bubble is just making this corner of the internet even more blind sighted by extreme left orthodoxy instead of being a corner of healthy and interesting debate.
Maybe instead of banning, add a disclaimer tag instead? I have no idea about the overhead for the moderators or if automation is a possibility.
We use Politico all the time as a generally reliable source on Wikipedia. The sponsored content is obviously shitty, but it’s clearly distinguished by its “Sponsored” mark. If that goes, then banning it as a source might be a level-headed response.
And yet, if you read Wikipedia’s own pages on Politico and Axel Springer it is clearly not a reliable source…
I’m acutely against blanket bans of news sources. Even one as ostensibly anti working class and European pronciples as politico.
Is there any option between banning and doing nothing? I do get the impression that some of their articles are decent, and I would agree that they’re not that right wing in general (in contrast to Bild and Welt).
Some news outlets are being removed only when the articles are about certain topics and Xitter is only to be linked through xcancel. But besides archive.org I don’t know what would provide access to articles without giving Axel Springer the click. And AFAIK automatic flags like “Treat article with caution due to [factor]” don’t exist in Lemmy.
There’s probably topics that politico is more obviously biased about (e.g. Israel?), so we could remove those.
Can you set up a comment bot and pin its comment under every politico post?
That would not fix the issue of giving clicks to Axel Springer.
i think it is necessary to occasionally see what ‘the other side’ is pushing, just to be prepared.
so i’d say autotagging posts pointing to certain domains with a “warning” label (like for example https://ground.news/ is doing) might be the better approach.
but lemmy afaik does not have a feature like this; so banning might be the next best thing 🤷🏻♀️
I wouldn’t care if it was every now and then, but recently the frequency of Politico articles being shared here has skyrocketed - mostly by a single user, but I have seen them being posted by others, too.
Banning newspapers? What are we talking about? Wtf
Yes, they have some well written and researched articles, which I shared.
Politico Europe as a main driver of the far right, which it persistently criticizes, investigates and denounces.
Why are you on this vendetta?
The publisher and its news outlets (with the aforementioned Bild, Fakt and Welt most prominent) is a main driver for a news coverage and reporting that is jointly responsible for the rise of the far right in Germany and Europe.
how do you @Pip@feddit.org turn this 👆 into this 👇?
Politico Europe as a main driver of the far right, which it persistently criticizes, investigates and denounces.
And then you use ground news as some kind of purity test, as if it’s worth any consideration. 10/10 chances they use an LLM to summarise their descriptions of news orgs. Only a complete fool (or lazy fool) would even entertain the idea politico is anywhere close to being left leaning or using ground news for anything at all.
