fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square95linkfedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down15
arrow-up1544arrow-down1external-linkArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square95linkfedilink
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 hours agoThat used to be the standard…
minus-squarerodneylives@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoKey is, used to be. Ars Technica is one of the best such magazines out there, but even their margins have to be razor thin. To stay at the top of Google search results you have to update super frequently. (Source: this Metafilter post: https://www.metafilter.com/212411/Ars-Technica-Pulls-AI-Article-With-AI-Fabricated-Quotes#8819559)
minus-square5gruel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoI highly doubt that. how would that even work? a third-party to the publisher would have to check every statement before the issue goes to print. I can’t imagine this happening for anything that is not research papers or official reports. but I happy to learn something new.
That used to be the standard…
Key is, used to be. Ars Technica is one of the best such magazines out there, but even their margins have to be razor thin. To stay at the top of Google search results you have to update super frequently. (Source: this Metafilter post: https://www.metafilter.com/212411/Ars-Technica-Pulls-AI-Article-With-AI-Fabricated-Quotes#8819559)
I highly doubt that. how would that even work? a third-party to the publisher would have to check every statement before the issue goes to print. I can’t imagine this happening for anything that is not research papers or official reports.
but I happy to learn something new.